| I
SAW THIS DOCUMENTARY
John:
I met AJ at a show. He was a rep for a video company
called Moxie. This was back in ‘92 or ‘93. I had
just done some videos for Frank Black, and one of
them was on heavy rotation on MTV. At that point
video production was a boom business, and it was
very different for somebody who wasn’t working the
commercial side of things to have videos doing that
well on the air. So, he basically approached me
about being one of the directors for Moxie, and
I was intrigued about directing videos for other
bands. We worked on a number of different jobs together,
with both of us on the other side of the camera.
We did a couple of TMBG videos, Soul Coughing, and
Ben Folds Five—we did one for Edwyn Collins, which
was actually a big hit. (Starts singing: Never
met a girl like you before....)
Shirley:
We shot that in New York City ... that was
the first time I spent time with John. Consequently,
we worked with him on Soul Coughing in a small town
in Pennsylvania ... and the friendship grew from
those experiences. And I think that the first time
I met Linnell was at a taping of "The Larry
Sanders Show," when they were performing “SEXXY”
(from the album Factory Showroom).
I
actually studied acting and theatre but always had
a knack for pulling off some sort of event, or pulling
people together for some crazy idea I had. That
naturally translated into producing. Around the
time we started Bonfire we had several friends that
had just started their own businesses, a graphics
company, a flower design company, and we had the
crazy idea that we could, too. I look back on that
now and say thank God we didn’t really know too
much. We just had that enthusiasm that saw us through.
I mean, we started Bonfire with 5,000 bucks ... a
lot of things could have gone wrong!
AJ:
It was all just a big coincidence. I had gone to
see them at this show they played years ago, and
had I not gone to that show, the movie probably
never would have been made. I had wanted to do a
feature film; I’d done a short, and I was really
excited to do a long form project. The short was
a narrative film called Might As Well Be Swing,
and it played in Seattle at Bumbershoot (2001).
Shirley and I love Seattle, it’s probably our favorite
town. Might was sort of a take off on Bob
& Ted & Carol & Alice. I had seen
that play late at night on cable. It’s a very funny
film, but there’s a really strange moment at the
end when the four of them are in bed together—it
gets sort of deathly serious. And I thought it was
too bad that that scene wasn’t as funny, as farcical
as the rest of the movie.
Anyways,
I went to see TMBG’s show, and I just started thinking
about them, not just in terms of my own history
of having been a fan when they were starting up,
but more about the fact that they’d lasted for a
long time in the music business. And they were so
unique, and the things they were doing were so unusual....
You can’t say that there’s a lot of bands quite
like them. I’m big on being an independent artist,
or praising people who find ways of doing it themselves.
And they really sort of epitomized that. There were
just a lot of things that made the idea seem appealing.
And
like a lot of ideas I have, I need to revisit them
a day or two later and say, "Was I just drunk
when I had that idea? Or was it really a good idea?”
The more I thought about it, the more I realized
that the whole notion would be entertaining. Before
this, my wife Shirley and I had produced about a
hundred music videos, including “What's My Age Again?”
and “All The Small Things” for Blink 182. So, we
made enough money to do Gigantic—which is
all gone now!
John:
And then, over time, working together, we became
friends. AJ eventually approached me about being
in Gigantic, which surprised me. Not that
I didn’t think we were deserving in some abstract
way—we’d been around a long time as a band, and
are an interesting band as far as bands go—but we
hadn’t really ... a lot of our friendship was about
outside things. The stuff I did with AJ wasn’t usually
that TMBG oriented. And I don’t know, it seemed
unlikely that we’d be the subject of a movie. In
part because we didn’t really push our story forward
that much in promoting the band. We don’t usually
put our pictures on our own records!
BIG
CRACKPOT REALISM
AJ:
It was hard to know what to expect in terms of reactions
to Gigantic. There were fans out there and people
who really loved them, and I thought it would be
a pretty nice thing to have. I guess I thought maybe
we would play in a theatre in four cities or something,
before it would come out on video or DVD. Now we’re
coming up on our 75th city or something in theaters,
so it was more than we ever could have hoped for.
John:
When [AJ] first approached us, I just didn’t think
the project was going to get off the ground! (Laughs.)
Just because it seems so ambitious, so unlikely—that
it would be so hard to sell. He seemed to think
that there was something there that would drive
the film, and you know, I was sort of excited. And
I kind of dreaded the idea a little bit. We’re not
the kind of people who if we perform on television
we run home and stare at ourselves, you know?
I
think having worked with him, I trusted him, but
the thing that concerned me most was that because
we’ve been involved in rock videos—[it is] not the
most idealistic end of the music business. It’s
more about image making. It’s about making mortally
attractive people seem like they have more going
on than that, a lot of times.
A
lot of my conversations with AJ before we made the
movie were very practical. My concern was that I
didn’t want it to be an editorial on the shallowness
of the record industry, which I didn’t think was
an exciting through-line for a film about any band.
I had no idea what it was going to be like, but
I was impressed that the real through-line of the
movie was the power of friendship, and commitment,
and collaboration over an idea.
As
far as I can tell, the two reasons that John and
I are in a band after 20 years are much smaller
and more specific than getting a Grammy or getting
a song featured in a movie, and are the fact that
we really do get along, and that we’ve always gone
over as a live band in a very immediate way. Those
are the kinds of things I’ve found that are very
uncommon. Most bands’ live shows are just kind of
OK, and we’ve just been lucky that we click so well
together on stage, without working particularly
hard at it.
Sarah:
I have probably seen TMBG more than any other band,
except for maybe the Waco Brothers and Jonathan
Richman. I was a rock critic for a few years, and
reviewed a lot of shows. But I remember feeling
really relieved when I read something rock critic
Chuck Eddy once wrote. He said that he stopped going
to concerts for awhile because all he was doing
was standing there waiting for them to be over.
I like my apartment. I’ll leave it to stand in a
dark, crowded, smoky, sweaty room for a few hours,
but only if I care.
John:
AJ made his intentions clear when he proposed the
movie (i.e. not a straight documentary, but capturing
the idea of TMBG), but what people say they’ll do
and what they end up doing are often very different
things. I was really surprised at the end of it,
how close it was to his original intentions. He
actually really did make the movie he set out to
make, to tell the story he saw. But until I saw
the movie, I didn’t quite get it.
I
think the movie tells larger truths about our projects,
the larger truths of our intentions. John and I
have been very ambitious about how to deal with
what this band is capable of. John and I are guys
who could be in a party band. When we get together
we have fun and laugh really hard, and could have
done something a lot less ambitious artistically
than the one we ended up doing. Our friendship is
not that different than a lot of other people’s
friendships ... but I think that at some point early
on we decided to do something a little bit beyond,
a little bit special.
When
we were in our mid-20s and starting this band, we
had other friends in bands who were really trying
to make it. I’m sure you know people who are in
bands too who are trying to “crack the code” of
popular music, and figure out what the next big
thing is going to be. We knew a lot of people who
were sort of hung up on that kind of stuff, preoccupied
with those kinds of things, and it’s not an unreasonable
thing. I mean, if you want to pay for your rehearsal
space, you gotta have something to go on, or you’re
just spending all your spare money on your band.
And you sort of want to think it will move forward.
I
think we took a very opposite tact—this band is
never going to make it, this band is totally a personal
project, we’re going to take the lowest road imaginable,
and basically give up becoming commercially viable
immediately. Let’s just make the most interesting
songs we can think of, make these songs for ourselves.
And I think if we have an interesting time, it will
be worth it, even if nothing comes of it. And maybe,
if we're lucky, we’ll find an audience for what
we do.
AJ:
It’s great watching an artist turn a corner, from
being a band that you heard of, that reached a peak
of their time, but now they’ve reached the point
of being perennial artists, and people are starting
to re-look at what they do, and what was important
about them, and what was and is interesting about
them. And I think the notion that they’re ever going
to go away, or stop making music, even people who
don’t like them, or wish they were different, have
realized that they’re stuck with them. They’re not
going away.
Sarah:
One thing I do like about them is the way the culture
filters in and out of their songs. And by “the culture”
I mean, simply living here. Frequently, pop music
is so universal because most pop songs are about
love, which is the same in Finland or Angola. TMBG’s
songs take place here in the United States. I love
how “Purple Toupee” (Lincoln) hints at the
way children process the news, lumping Martin Luther
King, Jr. and Malcolm X into “Martin X.”
John:
We’re very abstract. We’re very committed to what
we’re doing, and very sincere. I just think—I don’t
know what that means, when you’re writing a song
from the perspective of a dictator—what does it
mean? And also, you know, there’s an element of
humor in what we do, an elliptical quality. There
are people who, and I could see why this happens,
but they are suspicious of what they may see as
an “inside joke” way of working, which is actually
worlds away from anything that we would be interested
in. We would be disgusted with ourselves if we thought
we were “getting over” in that way. I mean, honestly,
making our first recordings, and figuring out how
things would be held up to repeated listening was
such a big challenge for us. If it doesn’t live
up to repeated listening, what’s the point to it
for us?
Jonathan
Richman came from the same western suburbs of Boston
that we’re from, and the song “Roadrunner” was actually
kind of a local radio hit, on WCBN in the early
70s. I probably heard “Roadrunner” more than I ever
heard the Velvet Underground. The VU were resurrected
by rock critics at the dawn of punk rock, they became
much more relevant again ... in that way that
things kind of ebb and flow. I came to find out
more about the VU retroactively after finding out
about Jonathan Richman. But I love him. He’s a genius.
There’s something very brave about how his songs
evolved. He started out kind of a miniature tough
guy, and kind of evolved into.... There are two
parts of his career that he sort of lived through.
When the second album (Jonathan Richman &
the Modern Lovers, 1977) came out, with “New
England” and those songs on it, it was sort of a
new challenge.
Even
the cover—the striped shirt he’s wearing, it’s like
what people wear on sailboats. The photograph was
taken in one of those portrait studios that’s on
Newbury Street in Boston, like where your parents
get their anniversary photographs taken. I forget
the name of the place.... But there’s something
so extraordinarily earthbound about it, as a New
Englander. It’s just super-extra normal. Having
your photo taken in that studio was just the absolute
opposite of cool. It was like the most knowable
thing. That studio has photographs outside it, blown
up, that look almost exactly like the cover, that
just look like civilian people.
So
to see an album cover that looked like that, it
was like, “I could be anybody walking down the street.”
It was very mysterious. It suddenly made the whole
world seem a lot more interesting.
When
I play things of his for people who are not partial
to it, they always seem like they’re waiting for
the other shoe to drop. And in some ways, it feels
like maybe that's.... I’ve always noticed—we tend
to get two kinds of reviews. We get people who just
hate us because we’re not cool enough, and we don’t
fit into their emotionally arrested ideas of how
tough rock music should be. Which I find tedious,
but of course everybody hates bad reviews! Or we
get those who love us, just for the stuff that we
do, and they get it. But when we get mixed reviews
I’m always kind of interested, because what generates
the mixed reviews, or the qualified reviews, is
like this sort of strange suspiciousness of our
actual intentions. One thing that’s sort of nice
about sticking to our guns the way we have is that
some of that has fallen away.
Some
people thought that we could be so on top that they
would be subjected to a song of ours far more often
than they would ever want to hear it. You know,
because we write melodic songs. Well, melody is
a very powerful secret weapon in music, and in the
wrong hands it’s a very dangerous thing. People
would sometimes say, “Oh, they could have huge hits
if they wanted to,” but I sort of felt like the
way people talked about it was as if we had an atomic
bomb strapped to our chests, and were ready to blow
it off at any moment....
Sarah:
Well, I suppose [TMBG and Jonathan Richman] have
that good-natured Massachusetts connection, and
an inventive use of language. But I actually think
Jonathan Richman reminds me more of Jerry Lee Lewis.
He’s such a singular individual, sort of mythic
and above the fray. “I’m going to meet you on the
Astral Plane,” he used to sing, and that’s where
I think of him. The Giants, for all of their lyrical
flights of fancy, seem more realistic, maybe because
of Brooklyn. They’re not the “Astral Plane” to me.
They’re the first stop on the “L” train.
AJ:
TMBG, like David Byrne and Jonathan Richman, all
have a literary quality about them. That’s one of
the reasons they can survive—that’s always going
to be interesting. Not all music has to grab you
by the crotch. Some of it can get in your brain
and stimulate your senses. It can rock out, but
it doesn’t have to aim below the belt (in more than
hypothetical terms). I’m suspicious of people who
need it to be one way or the other.
John:
We all live in the world, the physical limitations
of the physical world are real. It’s hard to get
away from gravity, it’s hard to get away from consciousness.
All of those things tether us to reality. And I
think that when art is really successful that we
can somehow be free of those things. And that’s
a very magical thing. You’re basically taking common
things and seeing them again for the first time.
In any good art, you see common things reanimated
in a way that makes you reconsider them. You know,
like Shakespeare is really tragic and funny, and
all those things, but the main thing about Shakespeare
is that you hear the words and you didn’t understand
that the words could be reorganized in such a powerful
way.
Yeah,
there was something unpretentious about that Boston
scene. In some ways, I’m not sure we could have
been a Boston band. I felt like we had to get away
from Boston a little bit to “get our freak on” with
the project, because we were interested in more
over-the-top theatrical ideas, and how the songs
would work. And it wouldn’t be in keeping with the
Boston thing. In a way, Jonathan Richman did everything
we could have done in the context of the Boston
rock scene ... like Willie Alexander, something
more straight ahead.
|