|
|
|

|
|

By Chris M. Short
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Norman
Blake, Raymond McGinley, and Gerard (Gerry) Love are
Teenage Fanclub, which may be the most underrated band
of all time (even more so than Big Star, a band to which
they are inevitably compared). Prophesied by critics
as the Next
Big Thing
in 1991 (and we all know what became the Big
Thing
that year), Teenage Fanclub was then summarily tossed
off as yesterday’s news as “the Seattle sound” usurped
the rock world. But Teenage Fanclub has thrived under
the radar.
To
date, the band’s sizable discography includes seven
proper albums and a number of EPs, singles, and compilation
tracks (and in 2003 a "Retrospective" release
on JetSet), but Teenage Fanclub has never had a single
chart on the US Billboard Top 40. And the only UK Top
40 hit came in 1997 (“Ain’t That Enough”), nearly ten
years after the band's inception.
But
fuck charts. Not since the Beatles has a band included
three songwriters with a proclivity for top-shelf songwriting.
This is not hyperbole. The value of Teenage Fanclub
is not in its story, but in song quality (my assertion
is that this should be the gauge for any band). Teenage
Fanclub songs are too impeccably crafted, too insanely
catchy, and too subtly experimental to be merely commodified
pop music.
According
to the soulfully pedantic rock critic/historian/philosopher
Greil Marcus, a good record is “one that carries surprise,
pleasure, shock, ambiguity, contingency, or a hundred
other things, each with a faraway sense of the absolute,”
and a bad record is “one that subverts any possibility
of an apprehension of the absolute ... a record that
is so cramped and careful in spirit that it wants most
of all to be liked.” I agree. So many records strive
to
be liked,
to be all
good.
But the good record is good art, a gift rather than
a commodity, it gives life. And Teenage Fanclub’s records
are full of songs that contain twists and turns that
move your whole being, not simply your booty. Pay attention
discerning music listener, this is the story of good
records by a good band called Teenage Fanclub.
Even
in the earliest days of Teenage Fanclub, the songs
were there. Following the demise of Blake and McGinley’s
previous band (the absurdly named the Boy Hairdressers)
in 1988, the duo began writing and recording demos for
their next musical venture. Hanging out in the Glasgow
clubs, including Bobby Gillespie’s Splash One, they
met Love and asked him to join their new band while
attending a Dinosaur Jr. show. He accepted, and the
trio went into the studio to record the first Teenage
Fanclub album, A
Catholic Education.
Released
in 1990, the debut found Teenage Fanclub mining the
territory of their musical heroes—the Pastels, Sonic
Youth, and Dinosaur Jr.—and while the record is messy,
with heavily distorted guitar sludge, crude proto-grunge
instrumental jams, and mid-fi production values, their
collaborative sense of melody can be heard being born:
60s garage affectations such as handclaps, ba-ba-bahs,
and big beat hooks that showed the potential that would
be realized on their sophomore effort, Bandwagonesque.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
did an interview with this guy and he asked us, "What
are you listening to?" And we said, "Well, we really
love this Big Star record." And he said, "Well, I’ve
never heard of them." And we said, "Alex Chilton was
in ’em!" And he said, "Alex Chilton? I’ve never heard
of him either." ....a few months later he’s wrote
this article accusin‘ us of rippin‘ off Big Star!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Considered
to be the ultimate Teenage Fanclub record, the 1991
follow-up sold respectably in the US and UK (the band
even appeared as the musical guest on "Saturday Night
Live”). Still, some questioned the legitimacy of Teenage
Fanclub’s music.
Jim
DeRogatis wrote about this in his “Great Albums” column
in the Chicago
Sun-Times:
“Authenticity has always been a thorny concept in rock
’n‘ roll. Critics love to laud originality and innovation,
but this has always been a bastardized art form, wantonly
stealing from any number of other styles and genres.
In rock, nothing under the sun is ever really new.…
If the music is good, just turn it up!” In its review
section, Rolling
Stone
declared the album mediocre with a couple stars.
Going
further near their homeland, Melody
Maker’s
Paul Lester called Bandwagonesque
a note-for-note rip off of 70s cult rock faves Big Star.
“This
is totally true,” singer/guitarist Blake recalled during
a recent interview, laughing. "We met [Lester] right
around the time we were doing A
Catholic Education,
and we’d been listening to a lot of Big Star at the
time, and Exile
On Main Street.
We did an interview with this guy and he asked us, ‘What
are you listening to?’ And we said, 'Well, we really
love this Big Star record.’ And he said, ‘Well, I’ve
never heard of them.’ And we said, ‘Alex Chilton was
in ’em!’ And he said, ‘Alex Chilton? I’ve never heard
of him either.' ....A few months later he’s wrote
this article accusin‘ us of rippin‘ off Big Star!"
But
Bandwagonesque
had cleaned up the derivative and abrasive qualities
of A
Catholic Education
and let the melodies flourish, taking the band’s songs
to a whole other level. The guitars were crisper, the
vocals moved out front, harmonies abounded, and the
hooks were simply scrumptious. Songs like “The Concept,”
“Star Sign,” “What You Do To Me,” and “Metal Baby” defined
the creative Teenage Fanclub sound. Some shrewder underground
critics hailed it as a masterpiece.
I asked
Blake, what with all the attention, the press, the videos,
the strong singles, it had to feel great, like they’d
arrived?
“I
guess we didn’t really think about it,” he claimed.
“When you make a record, you never listen to it again
if at all possible. You just do your best to make a
good record and people will either like or not like
it. It's great when you get a really positive reaction.”
Thirteen
was an eagerly anticipated record, but when it was released
in 1993 many felt that it didn’t deliver the proverbial
goods. Critics cited “Norman 3,” with its pop mantra
of “I’m in love with you, and I know that it’s you ...
Yeah,” as the flash point for all that was wrong with
Thirteen.
The repetition of the hook line (eleven times over three
minutes!) seemed to drive people bonkers.
This
confounded Blake. “Who’s makin‘ up the rules? Are people
making sure there is a melody, a verse, a chorus, or
whatever? I didn’t know that there were any rules, you
know?” He added with a devilish tone, “If someone thinks
there are too many ‘I’m in love with you’s,’ then actually
I’ll sing on for a bit then.”
Objectively,
the brilliance of the album’s best songs—“The Cabbage,"
"Hang On," “Ret Live Dead,” “Radio,” “Tears Are
Cool”—were possibly diminished by heavy expectation,
and the record sunk. Thirteen
may have also been panned partly due to the band’s own
lack of enthusiasm in interviews.
“It
ended up takin‘ a long time to make the record,” Blake
said. “When it came time to do interviews for it, we
were asked ‘What do you think of the record?’—‘Oh we
don’t like it, we’re sick of it.’ As soon as you say
it, everyone thinks it’s bad. Looking back on it, it’s
as good as we could have done at that time, and that
doesn’t make it a bad record.”
Incessantly
dubbed imitators by the ignorant majority of the press,
and a flop by the suits, indifference set in with the
masses—thus, Teenage Fanclub was freed; no one expected
anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We all felt that
we really wanted to make a good record, because Thirteen
had got such ... lukewarm
reviews. We really wanted to come back strongly. We
were quite well prepared for [Grand
Prix]
and David Bianco pushed us quite hard. We are all quite
happy with that record, and as a group I would say that
is probably our favorite record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| With
the Grand
Prix
record (released in 1995), the by-then ubiquitous in
rock distorted guitars gave way to a quieter, inquisitive,
deeper mood, yet no less intense, and the three songwriters
all began contributing equally great songs (erasing
the eerie and weird Lennon/McCartney/Harrison Who's
in control?
semblance). The pressure to make a good record came
from within the band rather than from a label.
“It
was summer, the weather was great, and we had all the
songs worked out,” Blake remembered. “We all felt that
we really wanted to make a good record, because Thirteen
had got such ... you know ... OK reviews, a lot of lukewarm
reviews. We really wanted to come back strongly. We
were quite well prepared for [Grand
Prix]
and David Bianco pushed us quite hard. We are all quite
happy with that record, and as a group I would say that
is probably our favorite record."
Teenage
Fanclub released Songs
From Northern Britain
in 1997 and Howdy!
in 2000, and the songs grew stronger and stronger; not
only the melodies and hooks, but also the lyrics.
“I
think that when the group started it was really always
the music [that mattered], and the lyrics were kind
of secondary,” Blake confessed. "As the group’s
gone [on], I think we all spend much more time on the
lyrics and see them being sort of central to the song.”
The
lyrics on the first three records were twee-romantic
and/or sarcastic, not awful, but kept the listener at
arm’s-length. On Songs
From Northern Britain
they seemed to be more revealing, bringing the listener
closer. “To me, I think a song needs to have good lyrics,”
Blake said. “That’s really important to make a complete
song. It’s not just good enough to have a good melody
and a hook. To make something really special it needs
to have a good lyric. It makes it harder—that’s the
challenge I suppose."
The
usual trajectory for a band over ten years old seems
to be to release the “good” records early in the career
and then fade into obscurity, releasing records that
are sub-par to pure shit. Sometimes there are just only
so many songs to be written, usually crafted in the
dynamic youth of the band. For some reason, Teenage
Fanclub has averted this course. The new tracks, “Did
I Say,” “The World’ll Be OK,” and “Empty Spaces,” from
the career retrospective on JetSet, 4,766
Seconds: A Short Cut To Teenage Fanclub,
are three of the best songs the band has ever written.
I mean call-your-friends-begging-them-to-buy-the-record-great.
Paradoxically complex and simple, the songs are infused
with piano, serendipitous drum fills, inconspicuous
guitar noise, handclaps, ear-opening changes—all contributing
to a traditional yet progressive pop noise. And all
three are intelligently romantic without cheesy clichés
and banality.
The
retrospective is a tremendous, if incomplete, document
of the reconciliation of the pop song craft with the
rock aesthetic. It seems Teenage Fanclub just gets better
with time. And still without long-term commercial success
(like R.E.M. or U2), Teenage Fanclub has stayed together,
regardless of units scanned or audience size. Why
is this?
“Um,
I’m not really sure, to be honest with you,” Blake responded.
"Probably the biggest factor would be that we all
go on pretty well together, you know. There isn’t really
the clash of the egos, we don’t have that in the band.
I think another one is that we haven’t worked too much,
and we haven’t over-stretched ourselves. There are three
of us writing the songs, there isn’t one particular
person to come up with an album’s worth of material
every year. So, for most groups, they run out of steam
pretty quickly when their main songwriter runs out of
ideas, you know. So, we get three times the life of
normal groups! (Laughs.)
“Don’t
get me wrong, we’ve done pretty well, we’ve made money
over the years, you know,” Blake added, rejecting pity.
“We still definitely do it for the love of it, and I
don’t think we just do it purely for cash. That just
seems depressing really. Obviously, you need to make
money and pay your rent, but if you ask any musician
the thing that drives them or whatever, it is to make
music. People will make music for not a great deal of
money,” Blake laughed.
Regardless
of the record you choose, Teenage Fanclub has always
made records that are good.
The band’s songs are an incentive for movement from
the listener. While some cannot help but fish for influences,
playing with quick dismissal like lint from their navel,
they miss the point. Teenage Fanclub is good
because the members do what they do without concern
for mass approval, progressively playing with pop structures
without pretension, cleverly moving them around, touching
the base of human pleasure with the fantastic noise
from their instruments, and affecting the mind with
smart words, contagious melodies, and sturdy hooks.
Teenage Fanclub may not have the noise and distortion
of ten years ago, but they are still a rock band.
I like
what Duglas T. Stewart (Blake’s childhood friend from
BMX Bandits) had to say: “On the surface [Teenage Fanclub
may have mellowed] a bit, but underneath I think they
are still rebels.”
“It’s
really good fun playing music, you know!” Blake summed
up humbly. “It’s a really good experience to get on
stage and crank up our guitars and sing harmonies with
other people!”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|